Individual Utility in a Context of Asymetric Sensitivity to Pleasure and Pain: An Interpretation of Bentham's Felicific Calculus

Abstract : This paper aims at exploring, in a formal way, Bentham's statement that “the pleasure of gaining is not equal to the evil of losing”, which belongs to those aspects of the principle of utility left aside by Jevon's reconstruction. Consequently, the agent's preference order will be viewed as depending on his initial situation, and on asymmetric sensitivity to gains and losses, relative to this situation. This leads i) to discuss the coexistence of multiple preference orders, illustrated by Bentham's analysis of the optimal labour contract, and ii) to introduce true deliberation as a consequence of the gap between positive choice and rival assessments of utility.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2000, 7 (1), pp.45-78
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00344899
Contributeur : André Lapidus <>
Soumis le : samedi 6 décembre 2008 - 13:34:39
Dernière modification le : jeudi 11 décembre 2008 - 01:08:21
Document(s) archivé(s) le : lundi 7 juin 2010 - 23:50:19

Fichier

Lapidus_Sigot_EJHET_2000.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00344899, version 1

Collections

Citation

André Lapidus, Nathalie Sigot. Individual Utility in a Context of Asymetric Sensitivity to Pleasure and Pain: An Interpretation of Bentham's Felicific Calculus. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2000, 7 (1), pp.45-78. <hal-00344899>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

250

Téléchargements du document

1248