Les revues d'excellence en économie et en gestion: discordances entre la classification de l'AERES et les facteurs d'impact par les citations

Abstract : In 2008, the French universities evaluation agency (AERES) gave its best grade (A+) to 90 reviews in Economics and Management among 684 academic journals. This paper shows that 109 journals among 594 (18%) remaining journals with lower AERES ranking (A, B or C), have larger Social Science Citation Index Impact Factors in 2008 than the journal ranked A+ with the lowest impact factor in their field. According to the impact factors, around a quarter of AERES top journals could be replaced by journals with lower AERES ranking. These discordances are concentrated in half of the 20 fields in economics and management defined by the French CNRS.
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00430528
Contributor : Jean-Bernard Chatelain <>
Submitted on : Sunday, November 8, 2009 - 4:34:39 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 3, 2018 - 8:50:04 PM
Long-term archiving on : Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 7:45:10 PM

File

AERES-IF-V3.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00430528, version 1

Collections

Citation

Jean-Bernard Chatelain, Kirsten Ralf. Les revues d'excellence en économie et en gestion: discordances entre la classification de l'AERES et les facteurs d'impact par les citations. 2009. ⟨hal-00430528⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

572

Files downloads

6420