M. Bajec and D. Vavpotic, A framework and tool-support for reengineering software development methods, Informatica, Lith. Acad. Sci, vol.19, issue.3, pp.321-344, 2008.

M. Bajec, D. Vavpoti?, and M. Krisper, Practice-driven approach for creating project-specific software development methods, Information and Software Technology, vol.49, issue.4, pp.345-365, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.05.007

W. Bekkers, I. Van-de-weerd, S. Brinkkemper, and A. Mahieu, The Influence of Situational Factors in Software Product Management: An Empirical Study, 2008 Second International Workshop on Software Product Management, pp.41-48, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/IWSPM.2008.8

M. Bloch, S. Blumberg, and J. Laartz, Delivering large-scale it projects on time, on budget, and on value, 2012.

S. Brinkkemper, Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, pp.275-280, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-35080-6

S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, and F. Harmsen, Assembly techniques for method engineering, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE '98, pp.381-400, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0054236

R. Deneckere, A. Iacovelli, E. Kornyshova, and C. Souveyet, From method fragments to method services, Proc. Of EMMSAD'08, pp.80-96, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00428991

T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr, Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review, Information and Software Technology, vol.50, issue.9-10, pp.9-10833, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006

B. Fitzgerald and G. Hartnett, A Study of the Use of Agile Methods within Intel, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pp.187-202, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/0-387-25590-7_12

F. Garcia, A. Vizcaino, and C. Ebert, Process Management Tools, IEEE Software, vol.28, issue.2, pp.15-18, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/MS.2011.40

J. García, A. Amescua, M. Sánchez, and L. Bermón, Design guidelines for software processes knowledge repository development, Information and Software Technology, vol.53, issue.8, pp.53834-850, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.03.002

B. Henderson-sellers and J. Ralyté, Situational method engineering: State-of-the-art review, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol.16, issue.3, pp.424-478, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1

C. Hug, R. Deneckère, and C. Salinesi, Map-TBS: Map process enactment traces and analysis, 2012 Sixth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp.1-6, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/RCIS.2012.6240435

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00701230

F. Karlsson and P. J. , Method configuration: adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets. Information and Software Technology, pp.619-633, 2004.

F. Karlsson and P. J. , MC Sandbox: Devising a tool for method-user-centered method configuration, Information and Software Technology, vol.54, issue.5, pp.501-516, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.009

G. Khodabandelou, C. Hug, R. Deneckère, and C. Salinesi, Process Mining Versus Intention Mining, Procs. EMMSAD'13, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_33

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00803968

G. Khodabandelou, C. Hug, R. Deneckère, and C. Salinesi, Supervised intentional process models discovery using Hidden Markov models, IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/RCIS.2013.6577711

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00803875

M. Laanti, O. Salo, and P. Abrahamsson, Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: A survey of opinions on agile transformation, Information and Software Technology, vol.53, issue.3, pp.276-290, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.010

I. Mirbel and J. Ralyté, Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches, Requirements Engineering, vol.5, issue.9, pp.58-78, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s00766-005-0019-0

I. Mirbel and V. D. Rivieres, Adapting Analysis and Design to Software Context: The JECKO Approach, Object-Oriented Information Systems, number 2425 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.223-228, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-46102-7_27

K. Mohan and F. Ahlemann, What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp.314-328, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_24

J. Ralyté, R. , and C. , An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, number 2068 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.267-283, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45341-5_18

C. Riemenschneider, B. Hardgrave, D. , and F. , Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.28, issue.12, pp.281135-1145, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2002.1158287

I. Van-de-weerd, S. Brinkkemper, J. Souer, and J. Versendaal, A situational implementation method for web-based content management systemapplications: method engineering and validation in practice, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, pp.521-538, 2006.

D. Vavpotic and M. Bajec, An approach for concurrent evaluation of technical and social aspects of software development methodologies, Information and Software Technology, vol.51, issue.2, pp.528-545, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.06.001

?. Zvanut, B. Bajec, and M. , A tool for IT process construction. Information and Software Technology, pp.397-410, 2010.