T. Asikainen, T. Soininen, and T. Männisto, A Koala-Based Approach for Modelling and Deploying Configurable Software Product Families, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol.3014, pp.225-249, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_17

M. Becker, Towards a general model of variability in product families, Proceedings of the 1 st Workshop on Software Variability Management, 2003.

D. Beuche, H. Papajewski, and W. Schröder-preikschat, Variability management with feature models, Science of Computer Programming, vol.53, issue.3, pp.333-352, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.scico.2003.04.005

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2003.04.005

A. Classen, Q. Boucher, and P. Heymans, A text-based approach to feature modelling: Syntax and semantics of TVL, Science of Computer Programming, vol.76, issue.12, pp.1130-1143, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.scico.2010.10.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00718291

M. Clauss, A proposal for uniform abstract modelling of feature interactions in UML, Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Workshop Feature Interaction in Composed System, 2001.

M. Cordy, P. Y. Schobbens, P. Heymans, and A. Legay, Beyond Boolean product-line model checking: Dealing with feature attributes and multi-features, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp.472-481, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606593

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01087792

K. Czarnecki, P. Grunbacher, R. Rabiser, K. Schmid, and A. Wasowski, Cool features and tough decisions, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems, VaMoS '12, p.2012
DOI : 10.1145/2110147.2110167

K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. W. Eisenecker, Formalizing cardinalitybased feature models and their specialization, Software Process Improvement and Practice, pp.7-29, 2005.
DOI : 10.1002/spip.213

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

K. Czarnecki and U. W. Eisenecker, Generative Programming, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-36208-8_2

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

O. Djebbi and C. Salinesi, Criteria for Comparing Requirements Variability Modeling Notations for Product Lines, Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06, RE'06 Workshop), pp.20-35, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/CERE.2006.2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00706358

M. Griss, J. Favaro, and M. Allesandro, Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB, Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203), 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSR.1998.685732

P. Heymans, P. Y. Schobbens, J. C. Trigaux, Y. Bontemps, R. Matulevicius et al., Evaluating formal properties of feature diagram languages, IET Software, vol.2, issue.3, pp.281-302, 2008.
DOI : 10.1049/iet-sen:20070055

L. Hotz, T. Krebs, K. Wolter, J. Nijhuis, S. Deelstra et al., ConWguration in Industrial Product Families ?The ConIPF Methodology, 2006.

K. Kang, K. Lee, and J. Lee, FOPLE ? Feature Oriented Product Line Software Engineering: Principles and Guidelines, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/ms.2002.1020288

K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson, Feature?Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, 1990.

E. Koshy, V. Koshy, and H. Waterman, Action research in healthcare, 2011.
DOI : 10.4135/9781446288696

J. Krogstie, Using a semiotic framework to evaluate UML for the development of models of high quality Unified modeling Language: Systems analysis, design and development issues, pp.89-106, 2001.

R. Mazo, Avantages et limites des modèles de caractéristiques dans la modélisation des exigences de variabilité, Journal "Génie Logiciel, issue.111, pp.42-48, 2014.

R. O-'brien-roberto-richardson, An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research Theory and Practice of Action Research, 2001.

K. Pohl, G. Bockle, and F. J. Van-der-linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Fundations, Principles and Techniques, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-28901-1

I. Rodrigues, N. Matos, S. Abreu, R. Deneckere, and D. Diaz, Towards constraint-informed information systems, IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/RCIS.2013.6577690

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00812059

P. Runeson and M. Höst, Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, pp.131-164, 2009.

P. Schobbens, P. Heymans, and J. C. Trigaux, Feature Diagrams: A Survey and a Formal Semantics, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06), pp.139-148, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/RE.2006.23

M. Sinnema and S. Deelstra, Classifying variability modeling techniques, Information and Software Technology, vol.49, issue.7, pp.717-739, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.08.001

M. Sinnema, S. Deelstra, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch, COVAMOF: A Framework for Modeling Variability in Software Product Families, Proceedings of the third Software Product Line Conference, pp.197-213, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-28630-1_12

M. Sinnema, S. Deelstra, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch, Managing Variability in Software Product Families, Proceedings of the 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability Management, 2004.

D. Streitferdt, Family-Oriented Requirements Engineering, 2004.

G. I. Susman-ed and . Morgan, Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective, pp.95-113, 1983.

E. Software, I. Spain, I. Technologies, and A. Germany, MASTER: Model-driven Architecture inSTrumentation, Enhancement and Refinement, 2002.