Corporate governance reforms and political partisanship: an empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries

Abstract : This paper explores the determinants of pro-minority shareholder corporate governance reforms. Using a Cox conditional model in gap time, this paper provides new empirical evidence on the linkages between the adoption of pro-minority shareholder corporate governance reforms at the firm level and government ideological affiliation in 16 OECD countries over the period 1970–2009. I find strong evidence linking rightward shifts in government ideological orientation with the adoption of minority shareholder protection legislation. This result supports our argument that changes in the composition of the coalition of heterogeneous interests and/or a change in the expectations of the parties’ constituency will affect government strategy on the adoption of pro-minority shareholder corporate governance reforms. I also find that the macroeconomic context at the international level may influence the adoption of these reforms. Our findings suggest that international economic integration has resulted not in the convergence of corporate governance regimes to the Anglo-Saxon model, but rather the emergence of hybrid corporate governance systems.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01248942
Contributor : Thibault Darcillon <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, December 29, 2015 - 3:15:27 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, January 30, 2018 - 5:50:04 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Thibault Darcillon. Corporate governance reforms and political partisanship: an empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Business and Politics, De Gruyter, 2015, 17 (4), pp.661-676 ⟨10.1515/bap-2014-0043⟩. ⟨hal-01248942⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

182