What notion of possibility should we use in assessing scientific thought experiments? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences Year : 2017

What notion of possibility should we use in assessing scientific thought experiments?

(1)
1

Abstract

It is usually claimed that in order to assess a thought experiment (hereafter TE) we should assess the nomological possibility, or realizability in principle, of its scenario. This is undoubtedly true for many TEs, such as Bohr’s reply to Einstein’s photon box. Nevertheless, in some cases, such as Maxwell’s demon, this requirement should be relaxed. Many accounts of TEs fail in this regard. In particular, experimental and some mental model accounts are too strict, since they always require realizability in principle. This paper aims at analysing the notion of possibility at play in the scenarios of scientific TEs, and sheds some new light on their nature and function.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
543-4973-1-PB.pdf (373.84 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01562615 , version 1 (19-07-2017)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01562615 , version 1

Cite

Rawad El Skaf. What notion of possibility should we use in assessing scientific thought experiments?. Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences, 2017, 4 (1), pp.19-30. ⟨hal-01562615⟩
111 View
347 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More