Service interruption on Monday 11 July from 12:30 to 13:00: all the sites of the CCSD (HAL, EpiSciences, SciencesConf, AureHAL) will be inaccessible (network hardware connection).
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

What notion of possibility should we use in assessing scientific thought experiments?

Abstract : It is usually claimed that in order to assess a thought experiment (hereafter TE) we should assess the nomological possibility, or realizability in principle, of its scenario. This is undoubtedly true for many TEs, such as Bohr’s reply to Einstein’s photon box. Nevertheless, in some cases, such as Maxwell’s demon, this requirement should be relaxed. Many accounts of TEs fail in this regard. In particular, experimental and some mental model accounts are too strict, since they always require realizability in principle. This paper aims at analysing the notion of possibility at play in the scenarios of scientific TEs, and sheds some new light on their nature and function.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [9 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Rawad El Skaf Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 19, 2017 - 1:58:48 PM
Last modification on : Friday, April 29, 2022 - 10:12:30 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, January 26, 2018 - 10:52:10 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive


  • HAL Id : hal-01562615, version 1


Rawad El Skaf. What notion of possibility should we use in assessing scientific thought experiments?. Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences, Société de philosophie des sciences, 2017, 4 (1), pp.19-30. ⟨hal-01562615⟩



Record views


Files downloads