Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Theses

L'intérêt à agir dans le contentieux de l'annulation des actes administratifs: étude comparée des droits français et allemand

Abstract : This dissertation aims to verify, if, because of the “subjectivisation” of the standing point, constantly raised in the literature, the French administrative procedural law. traditionally presented as an objective one, is getting closer to the German administrative procedural law. presented as the subjective procedural law par excellence. After a long period of hesitations and similarities, French and German administrative procedural laws adopted two diametrically different systems during the 20th century. However, in recent years various changes took place both in France and in Germany, which are due to two factors: the increase, on the one hand, of the number of triangular trials and the influence, on the other hand, of the European Union law. Thus. the legislator and the administrative judge restricted the standing point in France, whereas German law was led to modify the classic theory of subjective rights and to introduce some exceptions to the requirement of infringement of an individual right. Nevertheless, those similarities existing between the administrative procedural laws of the two countries do not achieve, for the time being, to alter their original structure.
Document type :
Theses
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03814484
Contributor : Ioannis Michalis Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, October 14, 2022 - 8:41:03 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, November 9, 2022 - 11:04:05 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : tel-03814484, version 1

Collections

Citation

Ioannis Michalis. L'intérêt à agir dans le contentieux de l'annulation des actes administratifs: étude comparée des droits français et allemand. Droit. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2019. Français. ⟨NNT : ⟩. ⟨tel-03814484⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

0