Natural resources in the theory of production: the Georgescu-Roegen/Daly versus Solow/Stiglitz controversy

Abstract : This paper provides a theoretical and methodological account of an important controversy between neoclassical resource economics and ecological economics from the early 1970s to the end of the 1990s. It shows that the assumption of unbounded resource productivity in the work of Solow and Stiglitz–and the related concepts of substitution and technical progress–rest on a model-based methodology. On the other hand, Georgescu-Roegen’s assumption of thermodynamic limits to production, later revived by Daly, comes from a methodology of interdisciplinary consistency. I conclude that neither side provided a definitive proof of its own claim because both face important conceptual issues.
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02332491
Contributeur : Quentin Couix <>
Soumis le : jeudi 24 octobre 2019 - 18:11:42
Dernière modification le : mercredi 13 novembre 2019 - 13:52:05

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Quentin Couix. Natural resources in the theory of production: the Georgescu-Roegen/Daly versus Solow/Stiglitz controversy. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), In press, 39p. ⟨10.1080/09672567.2019.1679210⟩. ⟨hal-02332491⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

84